For somewhere I read a phrase from Hegel teacher more or less saying (sorry if not exact) "in all things known and there is still something to be thought" . Is a phrase that, since I read it, I was greatly impressed and causes, in the sense of a challenging invitation, to set aside a certain innocence, a conservative conformism and reassuring that gives "the known." After all, think of what is known venture to not be as well, at the risk that stirs safe than previously thought.
Following this premise, one might well ask certain questions, such as Why am Kirchner?.
Perhaps the interesting question is not is "the" answer, but rather in the fact formulate and share in their diversity, precisely because what makes us think that we are all part of this space for the same reasons?.
precisely, is the diverse nature, what we call heterogeneous kirchnerismo which enriches it and makes men and women of different social status, economic, cultural, different political and ideological backgrounds we converge in this membership, without losing our identity, but together in the construction of the masses.
The list of events that brought us to this place can be really great, but for a synthesis, Hegelian phrase is giving us clues: the Kirchner has had the temerity to re-think the place to transform.
brava stop to argue, because it must set its weight of "natural order" to the fabric, the fabric of power relations, social, legal, economic, political and cultural factors that shape it, intended to consolidate and perpetuate.
Advancement from and possible answer personal, to the question: kirchnerismo, with a courage, had the insight to raise the necessary transformation that promotes not only political, economic and social, but also culturally, to the extent that has made each of us to question our own view on many issues.
If we remember a few words to forcibly incorporated into our everyday vocabulary a few years ago, we have a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhat we mean: country risk, market management, flexible , adjustment stand by, rationalization of expenditures, deregulation, foreign investment, convertibility, monitoring, and many others, were the semiotic arsenal (along with the repressive apparatus) with which we daily subdued, indicating whether or not we were "good way ", of course, designated by the compass that more than ever pointed north. Neither more nor less, the language of decline, the delivery of unconditional surrender, because he had an exclusion, a notable absence: the people.
No deliberate the people as a concept that denotes union constituted a danger to the prophets of dependency, they needed individual competition, the rule of the market to prey on taste. And if that was faltering, always put things repressive cudgel in his own point. ;
What are the words of this present? integration, inclusion, rights, dignity, production, parity, state intervention , allocation, distribution, social justice, Village returning as subject and beneficiary of the transformation, people who begin to understand why he many things happened in history and what to do to not repeat it.
should be in this subversion of language sepoy (and deeds) which operated the Baldwin Brothers is an example of cultural change, because it forced us to rethink a new meaning to issues that seemed all but immutable, and, above all, to banish the resignation as a destination, so I am Kirchner.
0 comments:
Post a Comment